kljКазанский лингвистический журналKazan linguistic journal3033-8751Казанский (Приволжский) федеральный университет10.26907/3033-8751.2026.9.3.419-430klj-216Research ArticleФИЛОЛОГИЯ. ТЕОРЕТИЧЕСКАЯ, ПРИКЛАДНАЯ И СРАВНИТЕЛЬНО-СОПОСТАВИТЕЛЬНАЯ ЛИНГВИСТИКАPHILOLOGICAL STUDIES. THEORETICAL, APPLIED AND COMPARATIVE LINGUISTICSДискурс безопасности в рамках мюнхенской конференции: лингво-компаративный аспектSecurity Discourse within the Framework of the Munich Conference: Linguo-Comparative Aspecthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-0893-2545ХисматуллинаЛ. Г.KhismatullinaL. G.

Хисматуллина Люция Гумеровна – кандидат филологических наук, доцент

Казань

Khismatullina Lutsia Gumerovna – PhD in Philology, Associate Professor

Kazan

hismatullina.lyutsia@yandex.ruhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2626-9150ГарифуллинаД. Б.GarifullinaD. B.

Гарифуллина Диляра Басыровна – старший преподаватель

Казань

Garifullina Dilyara Basyrovna – Senior lecturer

Kazan

daffodil.77@mail.ruКазанский (Приволжский) федеральный университетРоссияKazan Federal UniversityRussian Federation20262409202693419430Copyright © Хисматуллина Л.Г., Гарифуллина Д.Б., 20262026Хисматуллина Л.Г., Гарифуллина Д.Б.Khismatullina L.G., Garifullina D.B.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.kljournal.ru/jour/article/view/216

В статье представлен сравнительный лингвистический анализ выступлений лидеров Великобритании и США на Мюнхенской конференции по безопасности. Основная цель исследования заключается в выявлении роли языка в формировании позиции говорящих по вопросам глобальной и национальной безопасности. Методологическую основу работы составляют методы критического, когнитивного, сравнительно- сопоставительного, описательного и количественного анализа, которые позволили отобрать наиболее репрезентативный и достоверный речевой материал. Доказано, что лидеры государств используют определённый набор языковых средств и приёмов, характерных для их национальной идентичности и внутренней политики страны. Это помогает им транслировать собственные мысли, установки, ценности и приоритеты, а также формировать политический имидж и речевой портрет.

The article deals with a comparative linguistic analysis of the reports of Great Britain and USA leaders within the framework of the Munich Security conference and is aimed at distinguishing the role of language in shaping the speakers’ attitude towards the issues of global and national security. The research methodology is based on the critical, cognitive, comparative, descriptive and quantitative methods that has enabled us to single out the most efficient and reliable actual speech material that include personal pronouns, modal verbs, and emotive-evaluative vocabulary. It is proved that the country leaders make use of a certain set of linguistic tools and devices peculiar for their national identity and the policy of their country, which helps to deliver the thoughts, attitude, values and priorities of the speakers and model their political image and speech portrait. The authors come to the conclusion, that Biden’s speech was assertive and forward-looking, while Johnson’s rhetoric was more circumspect balancing criticism and optimistic perspective of Britain’s role on the international relations.

политический дискурсдискурс безопасностилингвистический методсравнительный анализречевой портретpolitical discourselinguistic methodpolitical discourse analysisspeech portraitcomparative analysisReferencesTrusov N.A. (2016). Methodological accents of understanding the phenomenon of Russia's national security. Mary Law Vestnik. 2016;3(18):28–33. (In Russ.)Trusov N.A. (2016). Methodological accents of understanding the phenomenon of Russia's national security. Mary Law Vestnik. 2016;3(18):28–33. (In Russ.)Political dictionary. URL: [accessed: 6.09.2022].Political dictionary. URL: [accessed: 6.09.2022].Treijs P. Defining security culture. Latvia, 3. 2015.Treijs P. Defining security culture. Latvia, 3. 2015.Bunde T. Introduction. Between States of Matter Competition and Cooperation. Munich Security Report. 2021; 16–37.Bunde T. Introduction. Between States of Matter Competition and Cooperation. Munich Security Report. 2021; 16–37.Nikolayev I.V. Verbal-symbolic structure of the official discourse of Russia's national security in 2009-2019. Nota bene. 2019; 6:50-58. (In Russ.)Nikolayev I.V. Verbal-symbolic structure of the official discourse of Russia's national security in 2009-2019. Nota bene. 2019; 6:50-58. (In Russ.)Zaharova N.V. Linguostylistic Means Formation of E. Macron’s Verbal Image. Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2023;6(4): 501–511. (In Russ.)Zaharova N.V. Linguostylistic Means Formation of E. Macron’s Verbal Image. Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2023;6(4): 501–511. (In Russ.)Takhtarova S.S. Communicative mitigation in different discursive practices. М.: IN-FRA-М. 2023: 138-148. (In Russ.)Takhtarova S.S. Communicative mitigation in different discursive practices. М.: IN-FRA-М. 2023: 138-148. (In Russ.)Generalova S.N. The concept of "political discourse" in the linguoculturological paradigm. Journal of Pushkin Leningrad State University. 2010;1:95–101. (In Russ.)Generalova S.N. The concept of "political discourse" in the linguoculturological paradigm. Journal of Pushkin Leningrad State University. 2010;1:95–101. (In Russ.)Temirgazina Z. K. Modal meanings as an effective means of linguistic influence in the speech of politicians. Political Linguistics. 2019;6(78):44–50. (In Russ.)Temirgazina Z. K. Modal meanings as an effective means of linguistic influence in the speech of politicians. Political Linguistics. 2019;6(78):44–50. (In Russ.)Bushkanets L.E., Zubkova O.S., Zvereva E.A. & Fakhrutdinova A.F. Tolerant Language Personality as the Basis of Communicative Interaction. Entrelinguas Journal. 2021;7(4). (In Russ.)Bushkanets L.E., Zubkova O.S., Zvereva E.A. & Fakhrutdinova A.F. Tolerant Language Personality as the Basis of Communicative Interaction. Entrelinguas Journal. 2021;7(4). (In Russ.)Remarks by President Biden at the 2021 Virtual Munich Security Conference (2021, February 19). Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/19/remarksby-president-biden-at-the-2021-virtual-munich-security-conference/ [accessed: 21.12.2021].Remarks by President Biden at the 2021 Virtual Munich Security Conference (2021, February 19). Available from: https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/19/remarksby-president-biden-at-the-2021-virtual-munich-security-conference/ [accessed: 21.12.2021].Boris Johnson's speech at the Munich Security Conference (2021, February 19). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxAHLRtwXLY [accessed: 21.12.2021].Boris Johnson's speech at the Munich Security Conference (2021, February 19). Available from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VxAHLRtwXLY [accessed: 21.12.2021].Abuzyarova D.L., Kochetova L.A. Mitigation in British Parliamentary Discourse. Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2024;7(2): 169–179. (In Russ.)Abuzyarova D.L., Kochetova L.A. Mitigation in British Parliamentary Discourse. Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2024;7(2): 169–179. (In Russ.)

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.