Transformation of the Image of “Grasping” in Interlingual Transfer
https://doi.org/10.26907/3033-8751.2026.9.2.251-260
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the interlingual transformation of the English “grasping” image when translating metaphorically motivated collocations with abstract nouns belonging to the hidden class of small objects (the cryptotype Res Parvae) into Russian. The research is based on data from the Russian‑English parallel subcorpus of the National Corpus of the Russian Language. The analysis includes contexts with the classifiers cast, catch, grab, grasp, grip, pick, seize, throw combined with abstract nouns selected according to the description of cryptotypes in O. O. Boriskina’s work. The aim of the study is to identify the main ways of transforming the original metaphorical image in the Russian language and to determine the most productive semantic models that replace it. The conducted analysis has shown that the “grasping” image is preserved in translation only in 20 % of cases. In the remaining examples, it is either replaced by other metaphorical models or completely erased. The most productive types of remetaphorization in Russian include: verbs of motion and spatial dynamics; verbs of sensory and cognitive perception; verbs denoting possession, loss, speech activity, and causation. The obtained results allow us to consider the identified transformations as a systemic manifestation of differences in the categorization of abstract entities in the English and Russian languages
About the Authors
E. V. KurenkovaRussian Federation
Kurenkova Elena Vadimovna – Lecturer
Voronezh
O. V. Donina
Russian Federation
Donina Olga Valerievna – Ph.D., Associate Professor
Voronezh
References
1. Fatkullina F.G., Zhang Xiaoyu. The Concept Joy / 高兴 in Russian and Chinese Linguocultures. Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2026; 9(1): 140–149. (In Russ.)
2. Shherbo P.A. (2012). Towards a Comparative Analysis of Linguistic Worldview Fragments: Exploring the Concept of “Age” Across Russian, English, and French Languages. Izvestija MGTU «MAMI». 2012; 2 (14): 138–144. (In Russ.)
3. Kretov A.A. The Role of Hidden Categories in the Typological Description of Romance Grammar. Proceedings of Voronezh State University. Series: Linguistics and intercultural communication. 2010; 10: 7–12. (In Russ.)
4. Boriskina O.O. Cryptotypes of the English language. Voronezh, Istoki; 2011. (In Russ.)
5. Dobrovol'skij D.O. Corpus of Parallel Texts and Comparative Lexicological Research. Trudy instituta russkogo jazyka im. V.V. Vinogradova. 2015; 6: 413 – 449. (In Russ.)
6. Shvejcer A.D. Theory of translation. Moscow, Nauka; 1988. (In Russ.)
7. Ni Siyu, Fatkullina F.G. Translation Analysis of Metaphors in Chinese and Russian Poetry (On the Example of Works by Li Yu). Kazan Linguistic Journal. 2025;8(2): 264–272. (In Russ.)
8. Kosticina R.V. A New Aspect of the Semantic Classification of Russian Verbal Vocabulary. Philology. Theory & Practice. 2023; 16 (8): 2592 – 2599. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Kurenkova E.V., Donina O.V. Transformation of the Image of “Grasping” in Interlingual Transfer. Kazan linguistic journal. 2026;9(2):251-260. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.26907/3033-8751.2026.9.2.251-260
JATS XML
